Every Dog is Different

Spend a little time surfing the internet looking at what dog trainers say they do, and you’ll run across this phrase.

Every dog is different.

It’s true. I can’t argue with it. So let’s read on. This statement is often followed by something along the lines of, “… so I will use every tool at my disposal to train your dog and not restrict myself to one type of methodology, like rewards-based training.” Sounds reasonable, right? You want your dog trainer to have All The Tools.

By way of example, here’s a statement from the website of a “balanced” trainer (edited slightly to obscure her identity):

Photo by Jack Brind on Unsplash

Photo by Jack Brind on Unsplash

Every dog is different. Therefore, we will use the tools that you and your dog need to get the results that you are looking for. We are open to using buckle collars, slip chains, prong collars, e-collars, harnesses, standard leashes, retractible leashes, food, crates, toys, and clickers.”

Let’s do a thought experiment and replace “dog” with “child”. I know dogs aren’t children, of course, but an overwhelming number of us consider dogs to be family members, they experience many of the same emotions we do, and I’ll bet $100 that if you’re reading this article you’re concerned about your dog’s happiness and well-being. Enough parallels to justify a thought experiment.

Let’s swap out who’s getting educated.

Every child is different. Therefore, we will use the tools that you and your child need to get the results that you are looking for. We are open to using…” I can’t even finish the paragraph. It’s just too awful to imagine.

Every child is different. Which is why we need options like public schools, private tutoring, language-immersion schools, Montessori, special education programs, dramatic arts tracks… I could go on. But here’s the important bit: all of these options follow minimum welfare standards. And they’re staffed with formally trained and licensed teachers. We don’t let just anyone educate our children.

You don’t see statements like, “we mostly use lecture mixed with small group exercises, a pass-fail grading system and smiley face stickers, but when those don’t work with misbehaving children [children who can’t stop talking, children who are tardy, children who hit others on the playground, or children who throw things in class], we will hold them down and paddle them.”

Years ago, deliberately inflicting pain by hitting, slapping, spanking or paddling a child in the name of education was widely accepted. That is, until the research caught up with us. The research showing that corporal punishment can inflict long-lasting physical and mental harm on students. The studies showing that children who experience corporal punishment are more likely to grow up to use violence against other people in order to get their way.

When we educate children, we don’t use All The Tools. The ones that risk serious harm or side effects are off the table. The ones that might return our children to us, broken.

Photo by Daiga Ellaby on Unsplash

You won’t be surprised to know that we can now seamlessly switch back to talking about dogs. Studies show that dogs who experience physical corrections are more likely to show fear and aggression, and training methods that employ pain or the threat of pain put dogs at a higher risk for aggression towards family members and unfamiliar people. (For further reading, see here and here and here.)

A recent review of the literature on training methods found

…that aversive training methods have undesirable unintended outcomes and that using them puts dogs’ welfare at risk. In addition, there is no evidence to suggest that aversive training methods are more effective than reward-based training methods. At least 3 studies in this review suggest that the opposite might be true.

Our dogs rely on us for exactly everything. For companionship, protection from the elements, food, medical care. And for our empathy and compassion. They deserve better than a kitchen sink approach, one that will stop at nothing to achieve results.

We didn’t used to understand the long-term damage inflicted by heavy-handed dog training. Then we learned we could accomplish the same results without pain or force. Now we can do better, so we do.


Thanks to the fabulous Zazie Todd and her blog Companion Animal Psychology for bringing the lessons from science into our everyday lives with dogs.

Listen to the Whisper

Listen to the Whisper

Fergus often puts his ears back and turns his head away when Olivia approaches him. If Olivia gets closer or reaches for him, he gets up to leave. If she pursues him, he will roll over, showing his belly and staring at Olivia with wide eyes.

And when Fergus can’t get away fast enough, he growls.

Read More

This is Your Dog's Brain on Cheese

This is Your Dog's Brain on Cheese

I remember being that owner who had been told not to feed my dogs “people food” lest it reveal my weak moral fiber, and I remember the sneaky pleasure of finally getting permission from a bona fide dog trainer to just go ahead and pull out the cheese. What a crime it is that we’ve been told not to use our most powerful motivator when trying to train a dog to do a really difficult behavior. 

Read More

The Dog Whisperer Dispute

Have you been following the latest Dog Whisperer hoopla and are not sure what to believe? After all, isn't it just a matter of opinion? Isn't it unfair to persecute someone for a difference of methodology? Isn't there room here for all of us? Treats are fine for casual training purposes, but don't Red Zone dogs really need a tough-love approach?

Here's why dog trainers everywhere are so upset.

Photo credit: 88/365 by Sarah Buckley. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Photo credit: 88/365 by Sarah Buckley. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Consider for a moment that there are some among us who believe in witchcraft. Also a matter of opinion, perhaps. But let's say someone managed to land a TV show in which real children with diabetes were treated by a self-professed witch, using a new magical approach that was not based in any known medical principles. Let's say some of the children felt marginally better afterwards but some were actually being harmed by the treatment and, what's worse, many parents were so impressed by the magic of the approach that they were trying it at home instead of following trusted medical protocols. There would be outrage.

That's what's happening in the dog training community. We're outraged that someone would ignore decades of evidence-based animal learning theory, invite the most challenging dogs to him to be rehabilitated, and apply methods based in principles of calm assertive leadership. Which is folklore. Appealing folklore, I'll admit, but nonsense it is nevertheless.

Folklore versus science. It's that simple.

Photo credit: My Dog by Elizabeth Tersini. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Photo credit: My Dog by Elizabeth Tersini. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

It's ironic, some dogs respond just fine to methods based in folklore. The resilient, happy-go-lucky, I'll-do-anything-for-a-milkbone types. But the most difficult, the most panicked, and the most vulnerable -- of all the dogs out there, they deserve our very best. They deserve the science.

Behavior change is a slow, methodical proposition. It's about as sexy as ironing, about as dramatic as lawnmowing. Maybe it's OK to be entertained by magical behavioral transformations that occur simply through calm assertive leadership, but let's not sell it as truth and get people out there trying it at home.